It is called luck or, alternatively it is called "the problem is still hidden there waiting to happen"
Bad choice of words from me, It is possible Versaloon also works, the Atollic GDB server is just what I used for tests, it was worth reporting that you need the latest version.
Giovanni
New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
- Giovanni
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14444
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Salerno, Italy
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
- Contact:
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Hi Giovanni,Giovanni wrote:Note, in order to debug the STM32F0xx you need the GDB server
from the Atollic toolchain 3.1.0 (or use Atollic itself).
How about size limitations in this new GDB - according to them,
only 32kB possible from now on in the Lite version...
Do they really exist?
BTW. Just received mine F0-Discovery
Tomorrow will start integration with my test system...
Xml files for plugin in the works, too
- Giovanni
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14444
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Salerno, Italy
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
- Contact:
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
I never tested the limit, may be it is not present at GDB level. Anyway OpenOCD (development version) already supports ST-Link and that will be a more open solution.
Giovanni
Giovanni
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Hi Giovanni,
Bugs found in latest trunk file changes:
1. In file STM32/serial_lld.c line 87 it should be:
2. In file STM32F0xx/stm32_dma.h line 24 it should be:
Bugs found in latest trunk file changes:
1. In file STM32/serial_lld.c line 87 it should be:
Code: Select all
STM32F0xx devices and newer have an enhanced peripheral with slightly
2. In file STM32F0xx/stm32_dma.h line 24 it should be:
Code: Select all
* @note This file requires definitions from the ST header file stm32f0xx.h.
- Giovanni
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14444
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Salerno, Italy
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
- Contact:
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Fixed thanks.
I am working on finishing the F0 support, the ADC is very interesting, it is simpler than the other STM32 ADCs but I think it is much improved. The I2C also seems to fix the issues with the old peripheral. This F0 is a positive surprise, a very nice small device IMO.
Giovanni
I am working on finishing the F0 support, the ADC is very interesting, it is simpler than the other STM32 ADCs but I think it is much improved. The I2C also seems to fix the issues with the old peripheral. This F0 is a positive surprise, a very nice small device IMO.
Giovanni
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Yep - came into same conclusion during (almost complete) work on plugin STM32F0 xml filesGiovanni wrote:... This F0 is a positive surprise, a very nice small device IMO....
Last edited by Jacon on Sat May 26, 2012 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Giovanni
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14444
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Salerno, Italy
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
- Contact:
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Cool, let me know when it is done, I could use that right now.
Giovanni
Giovanni
- Giovanni
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14444
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 8:48 am
- Location: Salerno, Italy
- Has thanked: 1074 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
- Contact:
Re: New STM32F0 devices (Cortex-M0)
Thanks, I am debugging the ADC driver, it will be helpful.
Giovanni
Giovanni
Return to “Development and Feedback”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests