Search found 137 matches
- Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:48 am
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: variable mapping for STM32F769
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1901
variable mapping for STM32F769
Hi, i am using the STM32F769. The initialized variables are linked to ram0 (alias DATA_RAM) and not initialized variables are linked to ram3 (alias BSS_RAM) which are different as the mapping is as follows: ram0 : org = 0x20020000, len = 384k /* SRAM1 + SRAM2 */ ram1 : org = 0x20020000, len = 368k /...
- Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:51 am
- Forum: Small Change Requests
- Topic: STM32 LLD for UART with bus idle detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4117
Re: STM32 LLD for UART with bus idle detection
Hi,
is this item on track? I whould appreciate this feature.
is this item on track? I whould appreciate this feature.
- Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:39 pm
- Forum: ChibiOS/HAL
- Topic: STM32F7 hal_lld - STM32_LSEDRV
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2306
Re: STM32F7 hal_lld - STM32_LSEDRV
OK, i think my version is not the newest. It's not generated. I have to update the toolchain. Nevertheless the STM32_LSEDRV is checked for STM32_LSE_ENABLED with other ports (STM32F3).
Thanks
Thanks
- Tue Aug 15, 2017 11:40 am
- Forum: ChibiOS/HAL
- Topic: STM32F7 hal_lld - STM32_LSEDRV
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2306
STM32F7 hal_lld - STM32_LSEDRV
Hi, i do not use the LSE. So i disabled it in mcuconf.h. Futhermore i do not define STM32_LSEDRV in board.h because i do not need it. The problem is now that the percompiler throws an error in hal_lld.h because the error check is not within #if STM32_LSE_ENABLED as implemented in the hal_lld.h of th...
- Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:53 am
- Forum: Development and Feedback
- Topic: HAL Driver for STM32 DFSDM driver
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8202
Re: HAL Driver for STM32 DFSDM driver
Hi,
what is the status of this task?
what is the status of this task?
- Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:17 pm
- Forum: General Support
- Topic: Chibi Function Types
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1693
Chibi Function Types
Hi,
where is the documentation of the function types like i-class function or s-class? Which function are used in which context? I can't find that.
Thanks
where is the documentation of the function types like i-class function or s-class? Which function are used in which context? I can't find that.
Thanks
- Wed May 24, 2017 3:29 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: DMA init
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1869
DMA init
Hi, in the DMA init function in file stm32_dma.c is the following code snippet: void dmaInit(void) { unsigned i; dma_streams_mask = 0U; for (i = 0U; i < STM32_DMA_STREAMS; i++) { _stm32_dma_streams[i].stream->CR = 0U; dma_isr_redir[i].dma_func = NULL; } DMA1->LIFCR = 0xFFFFFFFFU; DMA1->HIFCR = 0xFFF...
- Wed May 24, 2017 3:24 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Dependency to kernel in uart lld Topic is solved
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2390
Dependency to kernel in uart lld Topic is solved
Hi,
there is a call to chDbgAssert in the UARTV1 lld source file. This has to be osalDbgAssert, isn't it?
Thanks
there is a call to chDbgAssert in the UARTV1 lld source file. This has to be osalDbgAssert, isn't it?
Thanks
- Mon May 15, 2017 8:01 am
- Forum: Small Change Requests
- Topic: adcSTM32EnableTS differences between ADCv2 and ADCv3
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2345
adcSTM32EnableTS differences between ADCv2 and ADCv3
Hi, why the amount of parameter of adcSTM32EnableTS is different in ADCv2 and ADCv3? ADCv3: adcSTM32EnableTS(ADCDriver *adcp) and ADCv2: void adcSTM32EnableTSVREFE(void) ADCv3 has two different CCR, but the temperature sensor is always connected to ADC1, isn't it? So the pointer to ADCDriver as para...
- Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:38 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: RTC callback setter Topic is solved
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3020
Re: RTC callback setter Topic is solved
So i have to define RTC_SUPPORTS_CALLBACKS to FALSE that the call rtc_lld_set_callback is not implemented and use EXT instead?